Jason Murray Kubler vs James McCabe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Apr at 05:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Murray Kubler vs J. McCabe

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kubler 1 - 0 McCabe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jason Murray Kubler winning 2 and James McCabe winning 0. The last match between Jason Murray Kubler and James McCabe was at the Brisbane 2 Challenger, 07-02-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kubler | 1 |
| McCabe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Brisbane 2 Challenger(02-07-25)
J. M. Kubler vs J. McCabe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,257,590 | Career Prize Money | $358,055 |
| 67.12% (449-220) | Career Total W/L | 56.90% (169-128) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 25 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
J. M. Kubler vs J. McCabe Match Preview:
When it comes to Mc Cabe's second serve adventures, he's slotted in with a 44.12% success rate, which is, let’s just say, not exactly the cat's whiskers. Kubler isn't leaps and bounds ahead with 44.72%, but every whisker counts. One might say these second serve stats are a crystal ball for predicting match outcomes. If we imagine a world where these serves are dogs, Mc Cabe's second serve might just fetch the stick… sometimes. Yet, Kubler’s is slightly more enthusiastic, like a golden retriever on caffeine.
Returning serves is where things start getting Shakespearean. Mc Cabe seems to borrow a page from the fabled Cat Shepherd’s manual, winning 48.22% of his opponents' second serve points. On the other hand, Kubler, the strategic tortoise, claims 45.35%. When it comes to intercepting first serves, the margin narrows to hair-thin percentages, with Mc Cabe swooping 23.8% compared to Kubler's 22.09%, both of which would make a groundhog pop out of its burrow in anticipation. How they deal with break points under pressure is statistically neck-to-neck. Mc Cabe manages to keep his composure, saving 55.26% of break points, only just teasing ahead of Kubler's 55%. Clearly, playing cool as a cucumber doesn't always work, but Mc Cabe seems to balance the cucumber act on these close encounters.
The yearly performance stats, however, draw a particularly vivid picture. Mc Cabe has seemingly taken an extended vacation when it comes to the win column, standing at a notable 0% win rate (perhaps he misplaced his tennis shoes?), while Kubler's been decimating the court with a 78.57% win rate (33 wins, 9 losses). When these two have faced off historically, our friend Mc Cabe has been the polite host, winning nada, with Kubler clinching the lone encounter. If one recall's their dramatic head-to-head episode at Brisbane 2 Challenger, Kubler took the trophy home, leaving Mc Cabe pondering a career in other hobbies perhaps.
Ladies and gentlemen eyeing the high-stakes of a deciding set, take notes. Mc Cabe has yet to taste victory in deciding sets over the last year, sitting perpetually at 0%, while Kubler confidently boasts a not-so-zeroish 44% triumph rate. Their matches average around 1:30:33 of court dance-off, but when the tie breaks — spoiler alert! — Kubler has unscrambled that singular egg with style.
While Mc Cabe wraps his head around his opponents' ranks at a leisurely average, Kubler's been combating foes ranked around 414.19, excluding any fantasies of giant-slaying. In the break point conversation category, not much separates these two again, with Mc Cabe securing 31.12% and Kubler 31.51%. Perhaps a fraction of a forehand separates their conversion prowess.
In the grand tapestry of stats, the foreordained victor of their next on-court duel is likely to be… Kubler. Unless Mc Cabe finds a magic wand or a rabbit's foot, Kubler’s greater exhibit of past prowess suggests he’ll sail through this matchup, letting Mc Cabe catch up on why it’s called a "racket" after all.
Jason Murray Kubler vs James McCabe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. M. Kubler vs J. McCabe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:30:33 | Average Match Time | 1:30:33 |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve % | 56% (34/61) |
| 83% (30/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (25/34) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (8/27) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 46% (28/61) | Return Points Win % | 21% (12/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. M. Kubler Recent Matches Played
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played

J. M. Kubler vs J. McCabe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.12% (449/220) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.90% (169/128) |
| 63.99% (997/561) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.69% (379/314) |
| 55.23% (8089/6556) | Games Win/Loss | 51.57% (3431/3222) |
| 65.18% (161/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.83% (137/92) |
| 70.14% (249/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 64.71% (33/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
| 2203 | Aces Total | 2055 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1853 | Total Double Faults | 669 |
| 1:10:9 | Average Match Time | 1:43:54 |
| 188.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.34 |
| 61% (19549/31843) | 1st Serve % | 60% (12105/20162) |
| 72% (13979/19549) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (8760/12105) |
| 51% (6229/12293) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3957/8057) |
| 44% (1437/3281) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (718/1763) |
| 40% (12881/32117) | Return Points Win % | 37% (7482/19989) |
| 51.92% (27/25) | Slam W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.06% (24/27) | Main Tour W/L | 31.58% (6/13) |
| 66.14% (166/85) | Challenger W/L | 52.50% (84/76) |
| 75.33% (226/74) | Futures W/L | 70.87% (73/30) |
| 68% (430/628) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (162/284) |
| 48% (15/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 55% (113/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (66/128) |
| 57% (107/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (55/95) |
| 90% (428/387) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/137) |
| 9% (428/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/20) |
| 25% (241/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (140/32) |